DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2077-6594.3.2020.208607

Looking for optimal standards, criteria and KPIs of patient centricity across the biopharma industry: an overview of existing frameworks and conceptual models (Part 2)

Oleksandr Gorbenko, Merlin Williams

Анотація


This work reflects the part 2 of our taskforce aimed to comprehensively analyse the selected 12 patient centricity frameworks/conceptual models and related key elements with the focus of their implementation potential and possible operational adoption by the biopharmaceutical industry.


Повний текст:

PDF (English)

Посилання


Being Patient-Centric: An evidence-based self-evaluation toolkit for pharma… as recommended by patient groups. PatientView; November 2017.

CTTI Clinical Trial Transformation Initiative. CTTI recommendations: effective engagement with patient groups around clinical trials, October 2015. Access mode: https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/files/pgctrecs.pdf.

Deane K, Delbecque L, Gorbenko O, et al. Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multi-stakeholder initiative. BMJ Innovation 2019; 0:1–13.

FasteCures Value Framework: Integrating the Patient Perspective into the Development of Value Frameworks, March 2016. Access mode: http://www.fastercures.org/reports/view/56.

Managing Performance in Patient Centricity. Making the link between value for patients and value for the pharmaceutical industry. A Kinapse white paper; 2015: https://info.kinapse.com/patient-centricity.html.

National Health Council (NHC) Framework Dialogue / Advancing Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research, Development, and Review of Drugs, September 22, 2015. Access mode: http://www.nationalhealthcouncil.org/sites/default/ files/PatientEngagement-WhitePaper.pdf.

National Standards for Public Involvement in Research. Multi-stakeholder group: INVOLVE, National Institute for Health Research, 2017; Access mode: https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/home.

Patient Centricity Frameworks. A practitioner’s guide; Eyeforpharma, December 2017.

PCORI Funded Projects: Sample Engagement Plans From Methods Portfolio, August 6, 2014. Access mode: http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-Sample-Methods-Engagement-Plans.pdf.

PCORI Patient Engagement Rubric Engagement Rubric for Applicants, Feb 4, 2014 (updated June 6, 2016). Access mode: http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf.

People and Communities Board. Six principles for engaging people and communities: Definitions, evaluation and measurement. Published by the People and Communities Board, with support from National Voices, UK; June 2016; Access mode: https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/public/publications/six_principles_-_definitions_evaluation_and_ measurement_-_web_high_res_0_1.pdf.

Perfetto et al. Framework: When is evidence sufficient for decision-making? A framework for understanding the pace of evidence adoption, in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, July 2013, Vol. 2, No. 4, Pages 383-391. Access mode: http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/pdfplus/10.2217/cer.13.39.

Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health (2011) 38:65–76.

Taylor J. Oral presentation at the Patient Summit Europe 2018, session “Discover the organisational blueprint for scaling patient centricity” / Being Patient-Centric: A National Voices Perspective; 16 October, London; https://s3.amazonaws.com/efpharma/patient2018/slides/D2-26+(b)+Jeremy.pdf.

University of Maryland M-CERSI Framework. Assessing meaningful patient engagement in drug development: a definition, framework, and rubric, March 2015. Access mode: http://www.pharmacy.umaryland.edu/media/SOP/ wwwpharmacyumarylandedu/centers/cersievents/pfdd/mcersi-pfdd-framework-rubric.pdf.


Посилання

  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.


Copyright (c) 2020 Oleksandr Gorbenko, Merlin Williams